POSTED BY Admin POSTED IN Uncategorized POST TAGGED 1950s, ads, African American, Asia, Asian, Asian-American, Asian-Americans, Asians, banking, Ben Carson, bigotry, bilingual, bisexual, black, Black history, Black Lives Matter, Blacks, census, Chinese, Chris Rock, commencement, community, culture, David Dao, democrat, demographics, disparity, diversity, economics, education, election, elections, Emma Stone, employment, English, ethnicity, film, food, Fox News, gay, German, German-American, hate crime, Hawaii, health, health care, Hispanic, history, Hollywood, housing crisis, immigration, immigration and nationality act, jobs, John Cho, justice, Korean, language, Latino, Latinx, LGBT, marketing, McKinley Texas, media, Mexican, Millennials, minority, model minority, money, mortality, Muslim, Muslim-American, nationalism, Obama, Orlando, Oscars, Pew, police, politics, polls, psychology, Puerto Rico, race, racial disparity, racial profiling, racism, Republican, sexual racism, shooting, South, South Carolina shooting, Spanish, stereotype, subprime, teens, Trump, Tuskegee, TV, Uncategorized, United, Univision, violence, voting, white, white history, white nationals, white resentment, white supremacy, White working class, whites, xenophobia
This article from the Washington Post is another in a long and continuing line of How Did This Happen analyses of the presidential election. This one uses the theory that nostalgia for White Christian America – presumably in the 1950s, whether or not they actually lived through the 50s – drove so many Americans to vote for Trump. Because nothing says nostalgia for a simpler time like a thin-skinned man with a fragile ego who tweets out provocations to foreign countries before he’s inaugurated and dismisses the entire intelligence community. Just like Eisenhower, right?
Sorry. Back to the race issue. White resentment is a real thing, and it’s been reported on in many outlets and researched by Pew and others. But the framing of the article, that all these voters wanted was a return to Andy Griffith America – Andy Griffith was a TV SHOW – sorry – shows that either these people are suffering from the worst case of cognitive dissonance ever, or the author is treating their racism with kid gloves. Here’s a key passage:
Seventy-four percent of white evangelicals believe American culture has mostly changed for the worse since the 1950s — more than any other group of Americans — compared with 56 percent of all whites, according to a 2016 survey by the Public Religion Research Institute. In sharp contrast, 62 percent of African Americans and 57 percent of Hispanic Americans think the culture has changed for the better, the survey said.
With his promise to “Make America Great Again,” Trump appealed directly to this sense of dispossession, and 81 percent of white evangelicals voted for him, according to exit polls.
Make America Great Again is about racism. Say it, Washington Post. Well, the writer sort of gets real with some fact-based history about the town The Andy Griffith Show was supposedly based on, Mount Airy, North Carolina:
Not everyone is nostalgic for the 1950s.
Ron Jessup, 68, who grew up in Mount Airy during that era, found the place generally friendly then, he said — as long as he and other blacks obeyed the racist laws and social mores of the time.
If African Americans went to the theater, they sat upstairs, he said. If they went to the restaurants, they avoided the counter. “We understood what was considered our place,” said Jessup, who is retired from his job as a high school principal in nearby Winston-Salem. Even now, all five Surry County commissioners are white.
Fictional Mayberry only represented part of the Mount Airy story because it only portrayed a white America, Jessup said.
And the article is still skirting the glaring truth: many of these voters don’t care just about the Bible or gay marriage or lower taxes, they want a White dominant America.
They’re not going to get it. It’s simply not possible. And they’re going to be very angry if and when they realize this.